I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.
2. Review the following EQs and
- Tell us if it meets the rule of 3 criteria.
- Tell why it does or why it doesn't
This EQ seems to follow the criteria. It provides a framework for studies, takes a stance and is specific.
b. What is most important to securing a conviction in a criminal investigation?
This EQ could be more specific about which career field will be used for the basis of research.
c. What is most important in creating a hairstyle that best satisfies a customer?
This EQ does not seem to take a specific stance.
d. How can an Anesthesiologist best treat chronic pain?
This EQ could be more specific about which kind of chronic pain.
3. Based on your review of the rule of 3 and your experience with assessing four EQs, please write another draft EQ for your senior project.
What is the most improtant element for a bystander to know to effectively manage a medical emergency?
